So ASRC and OS resamplers have completely different purposes.
OS resamplers are used to combine different audio sources with different sample rates, and convert sources with unsupported sample rates to the supported ones. ASRC produces both imaging and aliasing artifacts, but when the quality is high enough, both jitter and resampling artifacts can be reduced to negligible levels.
Audio playback for windows 10 windows 10#
I know there are some tricky caveats with Windows 10 though, one being the CAudioLimiter APO.Ĭlick to expand.ASRC on the same PCB as the DAC chip, or within the DAC chip (e.g. If I can get that working appropriately, I'll post the results here. I think what I might try as a next step is to see if I can create a setup which will allow me to perform the same experiment from the link in my original post and check to see how the latest Windows 10 version does when resampling from 44.1khz and 48khz to all other sample rates possible on my DAC. I guess to put it simply, with all else being equal my primary focus was to determine whether there was any single playback sample rate which would have the least amount of issues (distortion, noise, artifacts, whatever) as a result of windows resampling multiple sources having different sample rates themselves. I'm wondering if there may be similar negative implications related to Windows 10 or application audio performance issues with higher sample rates as well. That's a good point and I wasn't considering the possibility that DAC performance could potentially be degraded at higher sample rates. I could simply choose one of these top two sample rates depending on which sources I want to "optimize" for. With the above in mind, it seems reasonable to conclude that choosing a sample rate of 384khz would optimize 48khz sources while also making best use of Windows 10 resampler for 44.1khz sources, and 352.8khz would do the reverse, in favor of 44.1khz. Could this be a good middle-ground sort of solution, since a multiple of 48khz would work well for any 48khz source? ) that the Windows 10 resampler performs a cleaner conversion from 44.1khz to higher up multiples of 48khz rather than 48khz itself. Since my DAC supports sample rates up to 384khz, would it be better to upsample to a higher rate? In my research so far, I have seen some evidence (e.g. Spotify + Discord + Game audio)? Correct me if I'm wrong, but while choosing 44.1khz would be optimal for Spotify, it would likely be sacrificing Discord and Game audio to some degree since those are typically 48khz sources. Is there a general consensus on what playback sample rate would be best while listening to multiple audio sources in shared mode (e.g. I understand the idea of matching playback sample rate to source sample rate when listening to a single source, but what about when there are multiple sources and the Windows 10 resampler is doing sample rate conversions? Hello everyone - Long time reader and first time poster here.
0 kommentar(er)
